Online first date: 06 February 2026.
Sepsis Biomarkers: A Mandate Point-of-Care Tests for Every ICU in India
JASPI March 2026 / Volume 4 /Issue 1
Copyright: © Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Panda PK, Perumalla S.Sepsis Biomarkers: A Mandate Point-of-Care Tests for Every ICU in India. JASPI. 2026;4(1):Page No
DOI: 10.62541/jaspi101
INTRODUCTION
Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in ICUs in India using high resources. Despite the major advancements in critical care, case-fatality rates remain high because of delayed recognition, usage of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics, and a high burden of multiple drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) 1, 4. The cost of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Indian ICUs is substantial due to longer hospital stays, expensive last resort drugs, organ support, and excess mortality, imposing a heavy financial and societal toll 4. Diagnostic uncertainty amplifies the problem when clinicians can’t rapidly distinguish bacterial causes from fungal causes of sepsis or sepsis from sterile inflammation and this leads to their default to “cover all causative agents”, accelerating AMR and adverse events. Indian experience highlights how diagnostic errors cascade into wrong antimicrobial choices and worse outcomes, strengthening the case for diagnostic stewardship as the front-end of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) 5.
Recognizing this, the Society of Antimicrobial Stewardship PractIces (SASPI) in India has issued a list of Integrated Antimicrobial Stewardship (IAS) practice statements highlighting rapid diagnostics as a pillar of AMS implementation at the bedside. Point-of-care (POC) sepsis biomarkers are now a pragmatic, scalable, adaptable and dynamic drivers to reduce time-to-targeted therapy, shorten antimicrobial exposure, and curb AMR for Indian ICUs both public and private, large and small 6, 7.
WHAT ARE SEPSIS BIOMARKERS AND HOW DO THEY HELP?
Bacterial sepsis marker: Procalcitonin (PCT)
PCT rises with systemic bacterial infection and falls as infection resolves. Although it is not a truly specific marker for the detection of sepsis, its serial trends help us determine when to de-escalate or stop antimicrobials. Randomized and economic evidence shows that fewer antimicrobial days and better cost-effectiveness was observed when PCT guides stopping rules in ICU patients 8, 9.
Fungal sepsis markers: Galactomannan (GM) & 1,3-β-D-glucan (BDG)
GM is one of the cell wall components of Aspergillus spp. and reflects Aspergillus antigenemia whereas BDG signals a broad range of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). In Indian ICUs, where invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis are increasingly recognized, these non-culture based fungal assays enable earlier rule-in/rule-out, replacing weeks of empirical antifungals or antibiotics with diagnostic-driven care 3, 10, 12. UK real-world analyses show GM/BDG-anchored pathways lower antifungal/antibiotic exposure, length of therapy, and total costs while maintaining or improving outcomes 11, 12.
Old & emerging markers
With respect to evolution, many biomarkers have come to POC diagnostic division in the medical field. They also provide robustness and depth to sepsis diagnosis and monitoring within these complex patient cohorts, including their principles that are clinically acceptable and evidence-based (Box 1).
C-reactive protein (CRP) testing is widely available and inexpensive, but the specificity for sepsis is modest and should not be used alone to start/stop antimicrobials 8. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is an inflammatory cytokine that rises early and rapidly. When used as a single test its diagnostic accuracy is variable but it can augment early risk assessment or bundled triage when paired with PCT and clinical parameters 13.
Box 1: Details of major sepsis biomarkers | ||||
Biomarker | Lab Principle | Typical TAT | Sensitivity / Specificity* | Remarks |
Procalcitonin (PCT) | Immunoassay (chemiluminescent/ turbidimetric) | 1–2 h | 75–90% / 70–85% | Best for antibiotic stopping rules and trend-based de-escalation; anchor of bacterial diagnostic stewardship 8, 9. |
Galactomannan (GM) | ELISA on serum/BAL | 4–6 h | 70–90% / 80–90% | Supports aspergillosis dx; broncho-alveolar lavage GM > serum for ICU; use with host/radiology and pretest probability 10, 11. |
β-D-Glucan (BDG) | Colorimetric/ turbidimetric | 4–6 h | 65–85% / 75–90% | Broad invasive fungal infections screen (Candida, Aspergillus, Pneumocystis); negative BDG helps stop empiric antifungals 11, 12. |
C-reactive protein (CRP) | Immunoturbidimetry | 1–2 h | 60–70% / 50–70% | Non-specific; supportive when combined with PCT/clinical scores; don’t use alone for ICU decisions 8. |
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) | Immunoassay | 2–4 h | 70–80% / 65–75% (variable) | Early inflammatory signal; adjunct to PCT/sequential organ failure score for triage and prognosis evaluation; mixed stand-alone accuracy 13. |
Presepsin (sCD14-ST) | Chemiluminescent immunoassay | 2–3 h | 75–85% / 70–80% (heterogeneous) | Emerging adjunct; heterogeneity & access limit routine ICU use; consider in research/selected settings 14. |
*Performance ranges approximate pooled ICU data pertaining adult patients and vary by threshold, timing, and population 8, 14. | ||||
Presepsin (sCD14-ST) shows promise in meta-analyses, but the heterogeneity and the testing assay access limit its routine use in ICU. It may be best considered as adjunctive rather than an essential marker currently 14.Serum lactate: It is indispensable for diagnosing sepsis severity and monitoring organ dysfunction due to anaerobic causative agents of sepsis as it is a very well validated measure of anaerobic metabolism and tissue hypoperfusion 15.Total leukocyte count (TLC): Though non-specific, TLC remains a basic yet crucial indicator of acute host response and disease progression in resource-limited settings.Emerging markers (CD64 & sTREM-1): CD64, a neutrophil activation marker and sTREM-1 (soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells) have shown improved sensitivity and early detection capability in differentiating sepsis from other inflammatory conditions. Their utility, although promising, still requires broader validation in diverse populations 16.
Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg): Cryptococcal antigen detection primarily from the CSF samples is rapid, sensitive, and increasingly implemented in Indian clinical practice which is particularly useful for diagnosing cryptococcal meningitis, especially among immunocompromised patients.
Candida Mannan/Anti-Mannan: These assays help clinicians by giving an early diagnostic advantage as the turnaround time is less, when combined with BDG or GM, improving sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing invasive candidiasis.
Histoplasma Antigen: A highly sensitive marker for disseminated histoplasmosis, particularly in immunocompromised or critically ill patients. Its rapid turnaround time and easy detection in urine samples makes it a valuable adjunct in the early evaluation of fungal sepsis. When used alongside other biomarkers such as PCT, GM, BDG, CrAg, and mannan assays, Histoplasma antigen testing enhances diagnostic accuracy ruling out other causes and facilitates timely, targeted antifungal therapy for histoplasmosis 17.
WHY EVERY ICU IN INDIA SHOULD OPERATIONALIZE BIOMARKER-GUIDED CARE NOW?
Mortality and morbidity reductions through faster, targeted treatment
By differentiating bacterial vs fungal vs inflammatory syndromes early, biomarker bundles will shorten time-to-appropriate therapy and reduce inappropriate coverage which is critical in settings with rising carbapenem-resistant Gram-negatives and IFIs 2-4, 10. PCT-guided protocols consistently reduce antibiotic days, signaling towards improved survival in pooled ICU data 9. GM/BDG-driven pathways curb unnecessary antifungals while protecting high-risk patients from any delays in therapy 11, 12.
Antimicrobial savings & AMR containment
India’s AMR burden is among the world’s highest, with substantial excess costs at ICU-level 2-4. Every avoided day of broad-spectrum exposure reduces selection pressure and downstream the harm caused by Clostridioides difficile and Candida spp. PCT algorithms trim the antibiotic duration without increasing failures 8, 9. Diagnostic driven fungal strategies avoid empiric azoles/echinocandins unless indicated 11, 12.
Shorter ICU/hospital stays and lower costs
AMR cases in Indian ICUs add significant incremental cost and length of stay (LOS) 4. When biomarker-guided care de-escalates therapy and speeds definitive treatment, LOS and drug spend drop which is a double dividend for patients and payers. UK economic studies for fungal diagnostics show per-patient savings. With this, Indian ICUs can realize similar directional benefits by integrating GM/BDG with stewardship oversight 11, 12.
Fits national priorities & Indian stewardship practices
ICMR surveillance confirms the AMR headwinds confronting hospitals, while the SASPI IAS practice statements enumerate 42 practice points including early diagnostic stewardship and rapid tests as a backbone of AMS in Indian hospitals 3, 6, 7. A combination of tests detecting PCT with GM or BDG at triage and day-2 reviews directly operationalizes those points in the ICU workflow.
IMPLEMENTATION IN INDIAN ICUS
A three-test essential panel can be launched in each ICU which includes PCT for bacterial sepsis and GM and BDG for suspected IFI (e.g., pyrexia of unknown origin on broad-spectrum antibiotics, hosts exposed to filamentous fungi, influenza/COVID-19).
Start with a four steps protocol in each ICUs:
Step 1: Initial Assessment (Day 0) On clinical suspicion of sepsis, baseline PCT, blood cultures, and appropriate imaging need to be done. Start empiric antibiotics ± antifungals as per existing ICU protocol. In high-risk or immunocompromised patients with history of persistent fever, send samples for investigating the presence of IFIs with the markers like GM and BDG. |
Step 2: Reassessment at 24–48 Hours
|
Step 3: Ongoing Monitoring (Day 3–5) Repeat PCT every 48 hours if antibiotics are continued. Persistent reduction of its values supports right treatment/de-escalation and lack of fall will signal unresolved infection or complication. |
Step 4: Stop rule Exclusions Clinical presentations like infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, deep-seated abscesses, prosthetic infections, or CNS sepsis need to be excluded as specific guidelines are followed with respect to duration too. Stop rules cannot be applied in these conditions 9. |
This structured pathway integrates biomarkers into daily ICU decision-making, ensuring antibiotics and antifungals are given only as long as clinically necessary, reducing resistance, costs, and toxicity.
Training & governance
Use the SASPI IAS checklist and local antibiogram-GM/BDG pathways; AMS+ICU co-lead the daily “diagnostics & de-escalation” huddle. Quality indicators include antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT), time-to-active therapy, antifungal days, length of stay (LOS), and ICU mortality 6, 7.
Back-of-the-envelope business case (100 hospitals/year)
Sepsis admissions per ICU/year: 1,000
Antibiotic days reduced with PCT algorithms: −1.5 to −3.0 days per patient 8, 9
Empiric antifungal courses avoided/shortened by GM/BDG: 10–20% of suspected IFI episodes 11, 12
ICU bed-day & antifungal/antibiotic costs: local finance data vary; directionally, fewer days and drugs = lower spend 4, 11, 12
If each ICU avoids 2 antimicrobial days per patient and prevents/shortens antifungal therapy in 15% of suspected IFI episodes, a 100-ICU cohort (≈100,000 sepsis admissions/year) can avert ≈200,000 antimicrobial days and thousands of antifungal days, translating into large drug and bed-day savings and fewer AMR complications, without harm to patients. Even after reagent/analyzer costs, RCT and modelling data suggest net savings with PCT-guided care and cost reductions with diagnostic-driven fungal strategies 9, 11, 12. Over 5 years, expanding by 100 hospitals/year builds national coverage while standardizing practice around SASPI-aligned diagnostics. More importantly, each ICU can progressively use all evidenced sepsis biomarkers as described before, including metagenomics.
Limitations
These biomarkers are internationally recognized POC tests for sepsis, but their performance in Indian ICUs can be compromised by several unique epidemiological and clinical variables. High rates of concurrent bacterial, viral, parasitic, and fungal infections can confound biomarker readings, dampening specificity and leading to false positives or negatives, especially with GM and BDG in patients exposed to environmental fungi or receiving certain antibiotics 18. Most of the ICU patients are malnourished, which alters immune responses and may attenuate or exaggerate biomarker responses. There is a high suspicion that BDG and GM levels may be lower in malnourished hosts due to reduced fungal burden or altered metabolism. According to Indian epidemiology of infectious diseases where dengue and tuberculosis are highly endemic, the cytokine storm in these diseases can profoundly influence the reliability of PCT, forcing clinicians to critically re-evaluate the diagnostic cut-offs traditionally used in western cohorts.
CONCLUSION
The ICUs in Indian hospitals face a dual crisis of rapid rise of AMR and lethal outcomes of sepsis leaving no options for treating the deadly infections. The fastest path to safer, cheaper, and smarter care is with the diagnostic stewardship by including testing for biomarkers of sepsis like PCT to correctly guide the usage of antibiotics and GM and BDG to target antifungals, which should be further supported by culture, imaging, and clinical parameters. The current scenario in our country of including biomarkers testing is like a luxury, but it should become a foundational AMS infrastructure, as already reflected in national surveillance priorities and SASPI’s IAS practice statements. A disciplined, measured roll out of approximately 100 hospitals each year will reduce mortality, costs incurred, and protect antimicrobial efficacy for the next generation. The question for every ICU should no longer be “Should we implement biomarker-guided sepsis care?” but “How fast can we implement biomarker-guided sepsis care?”
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
None
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT:
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
SOURCE OF FUNDING:
None
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS:
PKP and SP: Conceptualization; Drafting; Resources; Critically review; Approve
DECLARATION FOR THE USE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN SCIENTIFIC WRITING: AI tool was not used in preparing this manuscript.
REFERENCES
Hammond NE, Kumar A, Kaur P, Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan BK, Ghosh A, Grattan S, et al; Sepsis in India Prevalence Study (SIPS) Investigator Network. Estimates of Sepsis Prevalence and Outcomes in Adult Patients in the ICU in India: A Cross-sectional Study. Chest. 2022 Jun;161(6):1543-1554. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.12.673.
Gandra S, Joshi J, Trett A, Lamkang AS, Laxminarayan R. Scoping Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in India. CDDEP; 2017. Available from: https://dbtindia.gov.in/sites/default/files/ScopingreportonAntimicrobialresistanceinIndia.pdf
Indian Council of Medical Research. ICMR-AMRSN Annual Report 2022. New Delhi: ICMR; 2023. Available from: https://main.icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/reports/AMR_Report_2022.pdf
Kadam A, Mamulwar M, Bhambure G, Bembalkar S, Bapat S, Mane A, et al. Incremental cost of treating antimicrobial-resistant infections among hospitalised patients in India: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e086505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086505.
Panda PK. Wrong diagnosis – Wrong antimicrobials: Rise in antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. IDCases. 2025 Jul 6;41:e02313. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2025.e02313.
Singh H, Panda PK, Patro S, et al. Integrated Antimicrobial Stewardship in India: Consensus on Best Practices, Current Baseline, and Identified Barriers. JASPI. 2024;2(4):32-45 DOI: 10.62541/jaspi054
Tan M, Lu Y, Jiang H, Zhang L. The diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:5852–5859. doi:10.1002/jcb.27870.
Kip MMA, van Oers JA, Shajiei A, Beishuizen A, Berghuis AMS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of procalcitonin testing to guide antibiotic treatment duration in critically ill patients: randomized multicentre trial. Crit Care. 2018;22:293. doi:10.1186/s13054-018-2234-3.
Schuetz P, Wirz Y, Sager R, Christ-Crain M, Stolz D, Tamm M, et al. Effect of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment on mortality in acute respiratory infections: a patient level meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;18(1):95-107. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30592-3.
Ray A, Aayilliath K A, Banerjee S, Chakrabarti A, Denning DW. Burden of Serious Fungal Infections in India. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 26;9(12):ofac603. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac603.
Earnshaw SR, McDade C, Bryan A, Ines M, Micallef C, Sung A, Enoch DA. Real-World financial and clinical impact of diagnostic-driven vs empirical strategies in high-risk immunocompromised patients with suspected Aspergillus infection (UK). Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(3):e0042522. doi:10.1128/spectrum.00425-22.
Hamilton DO, Lambe T, Howard A, Crossey P, Hughes J, Duarte R, Welters ID. Can β-D-Glucan testing in the diagnostic pathway for IFI reduce antifungal costs? Med Mycol. 2022;60(5):myac034. doi:10.1093/mmy/myac034.
Molano Franco D, Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Roqué I Figuls M, Montero Oleas NG, Nuvials X, Zamora J. Plasma interleukin-6 concentration for the diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 30;4(4):CD011811. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011811.pub2.
Zhang X, Liu D, Liu YN, Wang R, Xie LX. The accuracy of presepsin (sCD14-ST) for the diagnosis of sepsis: a meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2015;19:323. doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1032-4.
Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:775-87. 10.1001/jama.2016.0289
Teggert A, Datta H, Ali Z. Biomarkers for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Sepsis. Micromachines. 2020;11(3):286. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11030286
Huppler AR, Fisher BT, Lehrnbecher T, Walsh TJ, Steinbach WJ. Role of Molecular Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Diseases in Children. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017 Sep 1;6(suppl_1):S32-S44. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pix054.
Hammarström H, Kondori N, Friman V, Wennerås C. How to interpret serum levels of beta-glucan for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in adult high-risk hematology patients: optimal cut-off levels and confounding factors. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 May;34(5):917-25. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2302-9.
Submit a Manuscript:
Copyright © Author(s) 2026. JASPI- Journal of Antimicrobial Stewardship Practices and Infectious Diseases.
