Technical Letter
A Multicentric Assessment of Integrated Antimicrobial Stewardship (IAS) Practices Across Indian Tertiary-Care Institutions: A SASPI Capacity Mapping Initiative
JASPI September 2026 / Volume 4 / Issue 3
Copyright: © Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-commercial use, sharing, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original author and source are credited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Kaur N, Lal SV, Murali N, et al. A Multicentric Assessment of Integrated Antimicrobial Stewardship (IAS) Practices Across Indian Tertiary- Care Institutions: A SASPI Capacity Mapping Initiative. JASPI. 2026;4(3): Page No. DOI: 10.62541/jaspi187
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is a critical public health threat in India, worsened by overprescription, unregulated antibiotic access, and fragmented Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (AMSP) implementation. The Society of Antimicrobial Stewardship Practices India (SASPI) developed a 42-point Integrated AMS (IAS) practice statement in 2024 to standardize stewardship across institutions. This study assessed the current adoption of these practices across Indian tertiary-care hospitals.
Methods: A multicentric, cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted under SASPI’s capacity-mapping initiative. A structured self-administered questionnaire based on the 42-point IAS statement, spanning four domains — Administrative, Diagnostic Stewardship, Infection Prevention and Control (IPC), and Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) — was distributed to SASPI-affiliated institutes presenting at ASPICON 2025. Implementation was rated on a 0–100% scale and categorized as High (≥75%), Moderate (50–74%), or Low (<50%).
Results: Of 150 invited institutes, 17 participated. The overall mean compliance across all 42 items was 66.32% ± 18%. Diagnostic stewardship showed the highest adherence (81.76% ± 11.93), followed by IPC (80.12% ± 13.59) and administrative practices (66.34% ± 19.96), while AMS-specific practices showed markedly low adherence (37.06% ± 28.11). Ten of twelve AMS practice points — including pre-authorization of restricted antimicrobials, OPAT policies, PK/PD documentation, and antimicrobial time-out practices — fell into the “low” implementation category. Institution-wise scores ranged from 48.02% to 97.46%, with 5 institutions scoring “high,” 9 “moderate,” and 3 “low.” Conclusion: This multicentric assessment reveals substantial heterogeneity in Integrated Stewardship implementation across Indian tertiary-care institutions. While diagnostic and infection-control infrastructure is relatively well-established, dedicated antimicrobial stewardship practices—particularly those requiring active prescribing oversight—remain markedly underdeveloped, highlighting a critical gap between structural readiness and functional stewardship.
Submit a Manuscript:
Copyright © Author(s) 2026. JASPI- Journal of Antimicrobial Stewardship Practices and Infectious Diseases.
